
I knew at the beginning of the year, since we’d be studying European history this year in History at Our House, that I’d want to get a good map of Europe to which they could refer. Well, I didn’t find a good map of Europe. I found a fantastic map of Europe. This one. Big and colorful with lots of info packed onto it, but legibly. It’s been a great resource.
Even so, in terms of actually memorizing aspects of it, they were having troubles keeping all the countries in order, and the bodies of water as well. So one morning I sat them down and did what I do for myself: Start looking for connections and analogies. For the countries it was a matter of teaching them where the smaller ones are. I knew they knew where England, Spain, France, and Germany are, so I went from there. Here’s what I told them (click to open this simpler Europe map in another window to follow along, or zoom in on the one linked above) :
That’s as far as we got on countries. Then we moved on to bodies of water. They knew the Mediterranean, but couldn’t keep the Adriatic, Aegean, Black, and Caspian seas straight. So I pointed this out to them:
(Forgot about Norway, Sweden, and Finland. I taught them those by showing how they’re linked together like fingers of a hand, so they go together. What’s the order? They’re north, and a source of the Norse, so “NorSFin.” Sounds like Norsemen and gets them all in the proper order.)
These actually worked surprisingly well for my kids, especially since it was all off the cuff. A little WWII history helps, but they didn’t know it until I told them, and it still mostly worked as a link. A note on our maps: I spent hours and hours over a few days finding the maps I wanted. I ended up finding all three I had in mind from the same place, maps.com. Great company. I bought this world political and this world physical. Thrilled with all three of them. They’re all mounted on foam core and hanging on nails in our school area. I’ll be doing a separate blog on them at some point as well.
In more ways than one. Cold and wet and rainy out today—just as forecast on WFAA.com. Our local news outlet’s website—channel 8 here—is a daily stop for Angelina. For years now she’s been a hound about the weather, checking it first thing when she gets up, and throughout the day. (It never rains enough for her.) She tries to identify the clouds, and notices changes in them, as well as the wind direction. She’ll check our barometer if she remembers it. (The barometer which we bought a couple of years ago for a school science project. She picked one on—drum roll—the weather.) But her main fascination is with the extreme weather, tornadoes and supercell thunderstorms. The slightest bit of precipitation sends her checking the storm track. Hail? Tornadoes? Downbursts? She’s on ‘em like a duck on a junebug. No surprise, then, that she’s said more than once she may be a meteorologist when she grows up.
Her brother Alexander has no aspiration to that, but his interest in the subject is strong enough that he also chose a weather-related science project that year, and when choosing science-related place mats for the table a few Christmases back, we got him the weather one and her the astronomy. Now they argue about who gets to use it.
That all being the case, it seemed natural to see if our first behind-the-scenes trip this year could be to the Channel 8 weather studios. So a few weeks ago I popped onto the website to see who’d be best to contact about a tour. The answer was immediately obvious: Colleen Coyle. Who better to talk to Angelina about a career in meteorology than a woman with a B.A. and published in the subject, as well as storm tracker and meteorologist for the TV station whose website she checks every day?
I dispatched an e-mail to Colleen, and then sent a friend request on Facebook, since sometimes that’s a faster way to get hold of people. The e-mail did the trick. She replied that she’d be happy to do it, and suggested we do it at the satellite studio at Victory Park by American Airlines Stadium. We delayed it a few weeks so that my dad, then on vacation in Florida, could come with us. A private pilot of forty years with an avid interest in meteorology himself, I knew he’d like to join us.
We set the date for this past Saturday morning, while the show was still on. That way we could watch Colleen do the weather on TV before getting our tour. She did a great job of keeping in touch, even remembering after three weeks about our tour and e-mailing about it.
It only took half an hour to get there, and parking was a cinch, since it was early on a Saturday morning. After some initial confusion about where exactly to enter—we could *see* them doing the morning show through the glass walls—Colleen saw us and came to our rescue. We were “her people.” She was in the middle of a set, so she had us wait where we were at first to watch the proceedings, and then came over a bit later to offer the break room or a different vantage point from which to watch the show. They have five different sets/desks set up in the satellite studio, so we had to make sure we weren’t standing in a spot where at some point we’d show up on camera.
When she finally had a longer break she introduced us to everyone more properly. It’s a very loose set, with barely a handful of people making it go. Everyone was exceptionally friendly and, not surprisingly considering the venue, outgoing. Our four-year-old, Christina, had to go the bathroom, so at the next break we did take Colleen up on the break room offer. Christina got to go to the bathroom and my dad got his coffee. All was well with the world. Well, almost: Christina was disappointed there wasn’t any decaf for her.

When the show was over, Colleen came and got us and gave us a brief tour of the weather set/station. Since it’s a satellite studio, it’s mostly a computer bank with multiple monitors that she can use to make and call up the maps she needs, and the graphics she wants to use. There was of course the green screen that lets her stand in front of the radar and forecasts, and Colleen let the kids try it out. Angelina was wearing a multi-color striped sweater, so on the TV screen her green stripe cut her in half. She recovered nicely once she stepped back out. (Guess it’s green socks for Colleen on St. Patrick’s Day.)
As we were wrapping up, Colleen let the kids get behind the anchor desk to see what that was like. She gathered the on-air talent together with us and the result was this:
A quick poll on the way to the car found unanimous enjoyment of the experience, and was buttressed by quick smiles all around. So a big special thanks to Colleen Coyle, and kudos to the entire Saturday News 8 Daybreak staff at WFAA, for making it an enjoyable experience. Be sure to check out Colleen’s Facebook page, and you can also sign up for daily e-mail forecasts sent straight to your in-box every morning.
Before we started the school year, I knew I wanted to take the kids on some “behind-the-scenes” field trips. That is, I wanted to get them into some local businesses and institutions to show them how the world works. How their world works. I had several places in mind from the start: police station, fire station, a game-design business since they both enjoy video games, and one with a personal connection—a movie theater. After years of talking to them about film and showing them how to make little stop-motion movies of their own, I wanted to get them into a projection booth so they could see how the big dogs run.
Last month I finally was able to make that happen. A phone call to Cinemark Legacy put me in contact with its general manager, Melissa Rohrbach. My kind of manager, she was immediately and graciously on board with the idea. She passed me over to her head projectionist, Paul Konen. He would be our tour guide.

It proved to be not just an informative trip, but an historic one. It just happened that I was scheduling our trip one week before that theater began the transformation to an all-digital theater. Film—the beautiful, ephemeral celluloid strip that’s delivered so many immortal moments to billions of people over the last hundred years—is officially on its way out as the format of choice for theater chains across the nation. Cinemark expects the segue to take place nationally over the next three years. Cinemark Legacy is the first stop on that journey, so we were privy to the last week of operation for the platters.
The first stop was an editing table, where Paul showed how trailers have been spliced onto features, and to each other, for decades. He was nice enough to hack off some twenty-four frame strips—one second’s worth—for the kids to take home. They got a kick out of that.
After that we began touring the projectors. The kids obviously didn’t know what to expect, so they were suitably impressed by the huge silver platters, wider than they are tall, from which physical films unspool across empty space into the huge projectors. At the projector of an empty showing of The Green Hornet, Paul actually let the kids make shadow puppets on the big screen. An exit poll of the kids revealed that as the favorite moment of the trip for both of them.
We got to see the difference in size and complexity—which is significant—between the newest generation digital processors and the older generation. We saw what a blown bulb does to the reflector around it.
And then we saw the digital projectors. Now if it wasn’t obvious, I’m a film snob. I don’t want to like digital. I saw the first generation digital projection back in late Nineties and wasn’t impressed. I saw the swirling digital artifacts and tut-tutted. I haven’t seen one since. Digital bad, film good. Up with film.
But I’m also not blind. I know full-well how far digital video technology has advanced over the past ten years. I now own high-def video equipment that testifies well enough to that. I know there will almost certainly come a time when digital projection will close the gap enough that even the most devout follower of the church of film will squint in utter frustration to tell the difference between one and the other.
As emotionally tied to physical film as I am, I came away with a new appreciation for why theater chains would want to make the switch. I knew it would make their lives easier, but I just hadn’t thought it through. Gone are the days of the editing table; thanks to feature films on hard drives, switching and arranging trailers is as quick and painless as moving files between your C: and E: drives. Films come in fifty- to sixty-pound canisters with thin handles that are a bear to get around; digital features come on a hard drive. From a central network hub, features are pushed out to individual projectors. The schedule can be created and modified as needed from a single computer station, and *poof*, it’s done. It’s impossibly convenient. And it saves money, since only one projectionist is necessary to run even a twenty-four-auditorium theater. For theater chains, there’s no good reason not to do it.
The film snob in me tells me I’ll still be able to spot the difference, and who knows, maybe I will. On high-end sound equipment, it’s easy to spot the superiority of vinyl over CD. That’s one of the main reasons vinyl is making a resurgence. But there’s no denying at least the convenience of digital technology, and how helpful that is especially in this case. I still believe film cameras will be around for a long time, but I fully expect to view them digitally without much reasonable complaint. I certainly won’t be able to complain about the scratches on the film, or the garbled soundtrack.
So an educational outing for all of us. Angelina has her film strip tacked to her bulletin board. Alexander’s is on his desk in his room. One thing for sure: When we see a movie in the theater the next time, they won’t be asking me what goes on behind the little window in the back of the auditorium where the light is coming out. Thanks, Paul, and thanks, Melissa, for the, ahem, illumination.
In their Montessori school, the kids never had a dedicated history class. What they learned of history was learned through the lens of social studies. That was much too restrictive for my taste, and we knew wanted them to be exposed to history directly as part of our homeschooling.
As an introduction to that, I intended from the start to make history more real to the kids by taking them to…a local cemetery. It’s funny, I suppose: Graveyards have never weirded me out. On the contrary, I remember being intrigued as a kid by the idea that there were people who lived where I lived, fifty years, a hundred years before. Hence I’ve never treated cemeteries as weird with our kids. They’re a resting place. That said, while I’ve had the intent for a couple of years, it wasn’t until now, at nine and ten, that I felt they were cognitively ready to begin comprehending the lessons involved.
They learned more than even I was intending. What stood out first, of course, were the dates, which got older, in general, the farther back we walked. They’d exclaim about someone being born in 1910, and then we’d find someone born in 1878. And then 1856. And then 1836. I pointed out to them that when that person was born, where they were standing was part of Mexico. That got a look from both of them. The oldest birth date we found was 1812. That was just four years after Lincoln was born, I told them. Another look. What I should have done and didn’t—need to do—is have them count up how many generations ago that was. I think they’d be surprised how few it is. (Only six or seven from my generation.)
An unanticipated (but not surprising to me) lesson for them was how hard life was for children a hundred years ago and before. They were at first confused, then sad, when they did the math on one and the age was only three years old. There were several like that. Three, two, one. One was a set of twins, born and died in the same year. And one simply said, “Infant,” with no dates. I told them I wasn’t sure what that meant, except that perhaps it died at birth before even being given a name. They were clearly troubled by it, but it gave me the opportunity to explain to them how lucky they are to live in the time they do, when science and technology have made being born and being little aren’t nearly so risky as they used to be.
Another unexpected revelation was that women tend to live longer than men. After seeing two or three dozen husband-and-wife graves, we came upon one headstone that had the birth and death years for the husband, but only the birth year for the wife. I asked them, “What’s different about this one and why?” It took a long moment before the confusion set in. ”The wife doesn’t have the year she died.” ”Why do you think that is?” Another pause, and then Angelina got it, surprised: “She hasn’t died yet?” Nope, I said, explaining that many married couples arrange for a single headstone for both of them, so when one passes, the birth year for each of them is inscribed. After we found a fourth one like that, I asked them if they were spotting a trend. Again it was Angelina with the strike: “All the women are still alive!” Yep. I told them that women tend to live longer than men. The sideways look she then cast at Alexander was priceless.
We left soon after that. (After I showed them a headstone with a Star of David on it and I explained that to them.) I could tell it had them thinking. Somehow we got to talking about cremation versus burial. They were struck by the idea of cremation. I told them that for a long time my plan was to be cremated, but that now I’m leaning toward burial. My reasoning, which I shared with them, is that I like the idea of there being a physical place for those who so desire to come visit me after the transition, and I like the idea of returning to the earth. (Though come to think of it, I would more quickly return to the earth as ashes than a body in a comfy coffin. I’ll have to think on that more.) Regardless, after hearing my reasoning, they were both still sure they’d want to be buried.
A bit morbid, to be sure, but it was a good experience for them. I don’t want to introduce such things too early to them, but I don’t want to wait unnecessarily long, either, especially when it can inform and expand what they’re studying. When we were leaving, I reminded them again why I’d brought them there: to help them understand that history doesn’t just happen somewhere else, a long time ago. That it happens in their own home town. That there were people living where they live, under much different circumstances, a hundred, 150 years ago. And that those people, while not necessarily the main movers of history, all contributed their part to it, locally, nationally, and otherwise. History shows the movements of people and the results those movements cause, and it was all of those people choosing to settle where they did that caused the town of Allen to come into being, and all the events—affecting scores of thousands of people, over the next 150 years, including, eventually, them—resulting from its creation. They just finished watching the Back to the Future trilogy. The effect of events big and small on future events is currently well impressed on them.
Our next history class is now written.
It is difficult to put a challenge on paper. I would rather look you straight in the eye and say, “I dare you!” In my mind that’s exactly what I am doing. I am on one side of a table. You are on the other. I am looking across and saying, “I dare you!”
I Dare You, young man, you who come from a home of poverty—I dare you to have the qualities of a Lincoln.
I Dare You, heir of wealth and proud ancestry, with your generations of worthy stock, your traditions of leadership—I dare you to achieve something that will make the future point to you with even more pride than the present is pointing to those who have gone before you.
I Dare You, young mother, to make your life a masterpiece upon which that little family of yours can build. Strong women bring forth strong men.
I Dare You, boys and girls, to make life obey you, not you it. It is only a shallow dare to do the foolish things. I dare you to do the uplifting, courageous things.
I Dare You, young executive, to shoulder more responsibility joyously, to launch out into the deep, to build magnificently.
I Dare You, young author, to win the Nobel Prize.
I Dare You, young researcher, to become a Microbe Hunter.
I Dare You, boy on the farm, to become a Master Farmer—A Hunger Fighter.
I Dare You, man of affairs, to have a “Magnificent Obsession.”
I Dare You, Grandfather, with your roots deep in the soil and you head above the crowd, catching the rays of the sun, to plan a daring program to crown the years of your life.
I Dare You, who think life is humdrum, to become involved. I dare you who are weak to be strong; you who are dull to be sparkling; you who are slaves to be kings.
I Dare You, whoever you are, to share with others the fruits of your daring. Catch a passion for helping others and a richer life will come back to you!
That ringing challenge comes from William H. Danforth, the founder and former chairman of the board of the Ralston-Purina company, in his little book aptly titled I Dare You. It’s been reprinted at least twenty-seven times since its original release in 1931. I’ve been reading it to the kids lately and they love it. They’ve actually requested it a couple of times. (Okay, Alexander has.) Kids love to hear this kind of message, which is good, since it’s a necessary thing for them to hear. Of all the books that ought to be required reading in school, this one should be high on the list. (I have some others in mind. Fodder for future posts.)
It can be bought new in its original format on the American Youth Foundation (which Danforth helped found) here, or used on Amazon here.
For a few years now the kids have occasionally gone to Camp Classen in Oklahoma as part of their YMCA Adventure Guides program. As it turns out, Camp Classen has begun offering homeschool days, and we decided to make a day of it.
We were to be there at 9:30 a.m., and leaving Allen at 8:15 we got there right on time. (That’s with a fuel stop.) Because of some confusion over which parking lot we were supposed to use, we had to hike and hunt a bit to get to the main lodge where everyone was to meet. (There was a clear path, so it wasn’t a big deal.)
I’d estimate there were forty or fifty kids and adults there, so a fine turnout it seemed to me. After a short wait while everyone made bathroom breaks and got organized, our hosts, Bradley and Heather Doherty, introduced themselves and some of the staff, and explained athe history and purpose of Camp Classen. Heather, who serves as the outdoor school coordinator, served as our main host and guide for the day. She was a gracious host with the patience of someone who’s fielded lots of questions from kids. After our orientation, she took us on a tour of the main camp, including the cabins, cafeteria, and a game building (basketball, etc.).

After that the kids got to choose two activities to do before lunch and an afternoon hike. Alexander and Angelina were split on what to do at first. They both wanted to do archery, but he wanted to go canoeing afterward and she wanted to shoot BB guns. He finally opted for BB guns himself, so after shooting arrows atstyrofoam animals, they shot BBs at some hanging targets.
We were among the first back for lunch and we staked out a place on the patio area. Both of them apparently liked my idea of propping my feet up on the stone wall and followed in kind. Alexander took off after eating to explore with some of the other boys. Angelina went with him on some of it, but after a while came back to hang with me.
After lunch there was time to play, which the kids filled with some tether ball and another game the name of which I can’t recall. It’s a bit like horseshoes, except it involves throwing a strap with bean bags on each end toward a couple of elevated horizontal bars. Now when I’d first looked into coming to the camp, I was a bit concerned about the hike.

I have asthma, and while it generally doesn’t bother me much, it’s something to consider, especially on a three-mile hike. Not all three-mile hikes are created equal, obviously. So I’d asked Heather by e-mail—she was always very prompt and helpful—how strenuous it would be. She said it was wasn’t all that, mostly just gradual inclines and switchbacks. Okay, cool.
She was right. My asthma didn’t bother me much at all. In fact, what turned out to be the biggest issue wasn’t my asthma, but how it would have been if Christina had had to come along. Thanks to one section of the hike in particular, I’m not sure I could have made it with her. There’s a single steep grade that has to be climbed almost on hands and knees. The guy with the backpack baby was able to do it, but that’s because the baby was riding. (Sleeping, actually, for most of the hike, head lolling over the side like a gravity compass. ”Down is *that* way.”) He wasn’t having to hold its hand and help it up the hill while trying to use his hands for balance on slick rocks. Oh, and another point: Shoes with tread—good. It’s darn fortuitous that we made Alexander wear his sneakers rather than his Crocs. The rest of the trail wasn’t a big deal. It still would have been a lot for a toddler, so think three or four times about toting one of those along.
All that said, it was a nice hike through woods and then into grassland largely above the tree line. I believe the top elevation is about a thousand feet. You get an expansive view of the surrounding countryside. It’s worth the hike. The hike itself was the kids’ favorite part of the day.
After the hike, and back on the bus that took us to the trail head, we got a tour of the ranch. Yes, it has a ranch. This piqued Angelina’s interest especially. Horses were a bonus she wasn’t expecting. We didn’t get to get out, but the ranch foreman came on the bus to give us a report about it.
Back at the lodge, we got some souvenirs and Alexander played with a large group of kids that learned—kind of—a new game that’s basically freeze tag with a soccer ball. He had a blast.
We finally gathered our stuff and headed back to the car for the 1.5-hour drive back. I think we might have actually made better time than that. It was a good day. The kids both had that happy, dazed look of kids whose outdoor fun meter had finally been pegged.
It’s a good experience I recommend. The hosts were gracious and appreciative of our being there. What’s happened is that the big groups that used to come from the larger independent school districts like Plano aren’t coming as often thanks to the economic downturn, so the camp is actively courting other groups, including the homeschool community. It’s a good fit.
Camp Classen. Davis, OK. Joe Bob says “Check it out.”